•  

    12 Facts About Microwaves That Should Forever Terminate Their Use!

     

    Are microwaves a benign bastion of convenience or a sinister contributor to biological and nutritional damage? A growing percentage of people are now heeding the advice of holistic health experts and disposing of their microwaves due to the dangers of microwaved food. Regardless of where you stand, humans are the only animals on the planet who destroy the nutritional value of their food before eating it, and the use of microwaves is no exception.

    Microwaves are a source of electromagnetic energy (a form of nonionizing form of radiation) electronically generated. When penetrating the aliments, they trigger an inner rotation of the water molecules inside the food. This rotation triggers a friction between the molecules and the result is a rapid growth in temperature.

    Microwaves use super-fast particles to literally radiate the contents of water inside food and bring it to boil. Not only has microwave use been linked to causing infertility in men, but it also denatures many of the essential proteins in the food making them virtually indigestible.

    Most animals will only consume food in its natural, unprocessed state, but humans actually go out of their way to render food nutritionally worthless before eating it. Think about all the prepackaged and processed foods we purchase and consume annually. It’s no wonder the state of our health is in dire straits.

    Microwave ovens work physically, biochemically and physiologically, producing ions and various free radicals, which destroy viruses and bacteria, but not toxins and microtoxins. The experts have concluded that food cooked in microwaves loses between 60% and 90% of its vital energy and, at the same time, the structural disintegration processes accelerates. Also, the nutrient substances are altered, leading to digestive diseases. These microwaves can increase both the number of cancerous cells in blood and the number of stomach and intestinal cancerous cells.

    Microwaves leaking radiation is a serious issue. Serious enough for the FDA to set legal limits on the leakage permitted by every microwave manufacturer. However, the only way to completely eliminate the radiation dangers associated with microwaves is not to use one. Microwave radiation has been known to cause cataracts, birth defects, cancer and other serious illnesses.

    Because of these causes the microwave ovens were banned in the Soviet Union in 1976. Soviet scientists found that the microwave exposure decreases the ability of some vitamins to by absorbed by the human body, dramatically accelerates the structural disintegration of all foods and reduces the metabolic stress of the alkaloids, glycosides and galactoses.

    In 1991, the Swiss Doctor Hans Ulrich Hertel made a study that demonstrated that cooking or heating food presents much greater risks for health than the traditionally cooked food. He found that people who ate microwave prepared food recorded losses in the hemoglobines and lymphoites.

    In 2003, a Spanish governmental study elaborated in Murcia demonstrated that the vegetables and fruits cooked in a microwave lost a percentage of 97% of the substances that contribute to reducing the incidence of coronary heart diseases.

    In Dr. Lita Lee’s book, Health Effects of Microwave Radiation — Microwave Ovens, and in the March and September 1991 issues of Earthletter, she stated that every microwave oven leaks electro-magnetic radiation, harms food, and converts substances cooked in it to dangerous organ-toxic and carcinogenic products.

    In Comparative Study of Food Prepared Conventionally and in the Microwave Oven, published by Raum & Zelt in 1992, at 3(2): 43, it states:

    “Artificially produced microwaves, including those in ovens, are produced from alternating current and force a billion or more polarity reversals per second in every food molecule they hit. Production of unnatural molecules is inevitable. Naturally occurring amino acids have been observed to undergo isomeric changes (changes in shape morphing) as well as transformation into toxic forms, under the impact of microwaves produced in ovens.”

    There are no atoms, molecules or cells of any organic system able to withstand such a violent, destructive power for any extended period of time, not even in the low energy range of milliwatts. Microwaves quickly destroy the delicate molecules of vitamins and phytonutrients (plant medicines) naturally found in foods. One study showed that microwaving vegetables destroys up to 97% of the nutritional content (vitamins and other plant-based nutrients that prevent disease, boost immune function and enhance health).

    Dr. Hertel was the first scientist to conceive and carry out a quality clinical study on the effects microwaved nutrients have on the blood and physiology of the human body. His small but well controlled study showed the degenerative force produced in microwave ovens and the food processed in them. The scientific conclusion showed that microwave cooking changed the nutrients in the food; and, changes took place in the participants’ blood that could cause deterioration in the human system. Hertel’s scientific study was done along with Dr. Bernard H. Blanc of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the University Institute for Biochemistry.

    12 Enumerated Effects of Microwaves.

    1. A breakdown of the human “life-energy field” in those who were exposed to microwave ovens while in operation, with side-effects to the human energy field of increasingly longer duration;

    2. A degeneration of the cellular voltage parallels during the process of using the apparatus, especially in the blood and lymphatic areas;

    3. A degeneration and destabilization of the external energy activated potentials of food utilization within the processes of human metabolism;

    4. A degeneration and destabilization of internal cellular membrane potentials while transferring catabolic [metabolic breakdown] processes into the blood serum from the digestive process;

    5. Degeneration and circuit breakdowns of electrical nerve impulses within the junction potentials of the cerebrum [the front portion of the brain where thought and higher functions reside];

    6. A degeneration and breakdown of nerve electrical circuits and loss of energy field symmetry in the neuroplexuses [nerve centers] both in the front and the rear of the central and autonomic nervous systems;

    7. Loss of balance and circuiting of the bioelectric strengths within the ascending reticular activating system [the system which controls the function of consciousness];

    8. A long term cumulative loss of vital energies within humans, animals and plants that were located within a 500-meter radius of the operational equipment;

    9. Long lasting residual effects of magnetic “deposits” were located throughout the nervous system and lymphatic system;

    10. A destabilization and interruption in the production of hormones and maintenance of hormonal balance in males and females;

    11. Markedly higher levels of brainwave disturbance in the alpha, theta, and delta wave signal patterns of persons exposed to microwave emission fields, and;

    12. Because of this brainwave disturbance, negative psychological effects were noted, including loss of memory, loss of ability to concentrate, suppressed emotional threshold, deceleration of intellective processes, and interruptive sleep episodes in a statistically higher percentage of individuals subjected to continual range emissive field effects of microwave apparatus, either in cooking apparatus or in transmission stations.

    Take a look around you at every person that still uses a microwave. The largest majority are unhealthy and overweight. The more you use the microwave, the worse your nutritional state gets, and the more likely you are to be diagnosed with various diseases and put on pharmaceuticals which, of course, will create other health problems that lead to a grand spiraling nosedive of health.

    Of all the natural substances — which are polar — the oxygen of water molecules reacts most sensitively. This is how microwave cooking heat is generated — friction from this violence in water molecules. Structures of molecules are torn apart, molecules are forcefully deformed, called structural isomerism, and thus become impaired in quality. This is contrary to conventional heating of food where heat transfers convectionally from without to within. Cooking by microwaves begins within the cells and molecules where water is present and where the energy is transformed into frictional heat.

    The following is a summary of the Russian investigations published by the Atlantis Raising Educational Center in Portland, Oregon:

     

    – Microwaving prepared meats sufficiently to insure sanitary ingestion caused formation of d-Nitrosodienthanolamines, a well-known carcinogen.

    – Microwaving milk and cereal grains converted some of their amino acids into carcinogens.

    – Thawing frozen fruits converted their glucoside and galactoside containing fractions into carcinogenic substances.

    – Extremely short exposure of raw, cooked or frozen vegetables converted their plant alkaloids into carcinogens.

    – Carcinogenic free radicals were formed in microwaved plants, especially root vegetables.

    Russian researchers also reported a marked acceleration of structural degradation leading to a decreased food value of 60 to 90% in all foods tested. Among the changes observed were:

    – Deceased bio-availability of vitamin B complex, vitamin C, vitamin E, essential minerals and lipotropics factors in all food tested.

    – Various kinds of damaged to many plant substances, such as alkaloids, glucosides, galactosides and nitrilosides.

    According to Dr. Lee, changes are observed in the blood chemistries and the rates of certain diseases among consumers of microwaved foods. The symptoms above can easily be caused by the observations shown below. The following is a sample of these changes:

    a.. Lymphatic disorders were observed, leading to decreased ability to prevent certain types of cancers.

     

    b.. An increased rate of cancer cell formation was observed in the blood.

     

    c.. Increased rates of stomach and intestinal cancers were observed.

     

    d.. Higher rates of digestive disorders and a gradual breakdown of the systems of elimination were observed.

    Decrease in Food Value.

    Microwave exposure caused significant decreases in the nutritive value of all foods researched. The following are the most important findings:

    1. A decrease in the bioavailability [capability of the body to utilize the nutriment] of B-complex vitamins, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, essential minerals and lipotropics in all foods;

    2. A loss of 60-90% of the vital energy field content of all tested foods;

    3. A reduction in the metabolic behavior and integration process capability of alkaloids [organic nitrogen based elements], glucosides and galactosides, and nitrilosides;

    4. A destruction of the nutritive value of nucleoproteins in meats;

    5. A marked acceleration of structural disintegration in all foods.

    How Do You Heat Your Food The Healthy Way.

    This is kind of a misnomer because there is truthfully, with perhaps the exception of dehydration, no way to heat food and maintain its structural and nutritional value. However, gently heating food in a cast iron pan over the stove may be the healthiest alternative to nuking it. This is the old fashioned way and it never failed our ancestors.

    Toss that microwave and strive to consume at least half of your diet from raw foods, that is a huge step in the right direction to maintain their nutritional value. My mother always used to tell me that if food comes from a package, or has to be heated to be eaten, there’s a good a chance it’s low in nutrition. She was right for the most part, so keep that in mind when venturing the aisles at the grocery… (By MARCO TORRES).

    http://realfarmacy.com/12-facts-about-microwaves-that-should-forever-terminate-their-use/ 

     


    votre commentaire

  • votre commentaire
  •  

    2 Simple Ways To Release Sciatic Nerve Pain At Home Using No Medicine.

     

    For anyone who may not be very aware of what the sciatic nerve is, then we will give you a brief description. This is the one that originates in the lumbar spine, from there it goes towards the glutes and it extends until the feet. When this nerve is affected, it can produce severe pains that can even paralyze you.

    In this post  we want to show you how to unlock and release sciatic nerve pain with two simple exercises that you can do in your own home.

    -Pregnant women and the elderly

    Those who suffer from sciatic nerve pain the most are the elderly and pregnant women. For them, it is especially important to calm this unbearable pain, bearing in mind that, in the case of the pregnant woman, her mood and health condition can affect the baby.

    As the sciatic nerve begins to suffer from wear and tear, the muscles of the hip and legs lose flexibility and elasticity. For this reason the person begins to feel the strong pain, because in trying to move as before, it hurts.

    Often, sciatic pain is usually related to the process of muscle contraction, which occurs after anyone’s 30 and 35 years of age. When visiting your doctor for the pain, it is very likely that they will prescribe some medications that, at times will have no effect. Worse yet, most of these drugs will end up damaging other areas of your body.

    In view of the above, in this article, we will present to you two fantastic exercises that will help you release sciatic nerve pain. We can assure you that, when you do them, you will get amazing effects.

    The purpose of these exercises is to stretch and relax the muscles next to the sciatic nerve. This will unlock the nerve, eliminate the tension and relieve the pain once and for all.

    Release sciatic nerve pain.

    Exercise number one:

    To perform the first exercise, you will need to lie on a completely flat surface. Next, lift your sore leg and slowly fold it upwards as close as you can to your shoulder. When you feel tension, you should hold that same posture for about thirty seconds. To finish, return to the initial position by stretching the leg on the surface. This process should be repeated twice more to achieve the goal.

     

    Second exercise:

    Just like the previous exercise, lie on a flat surface. Bend your knees and hold them with your hands, bringing them to your chest as much as you can. Try to keep the pelvis always on the floor. Now you cross your legs and stretch the one that hurts you the most. Hold that posture for about thirty seconds and resume the starting position. Repeat the exercise two more times.

    Keep in mind that to release sciatic nerve pain, it is very important to mobilize muscles, loosen tensions, relax them, but above all you must continue the exercises mentioned above every day.

    http://healthandbeautyqueen.com/2-simple-ways-release-sciatic-nerve-pain-home-using-no-medicine/

     


    votre commentaire

  • votre commentaire
  •  

    I'm a feminist and I'm against abortion.

     

    Erika Bachiochi was once supporter of abortion rights, but now thinks it's not about equality for women.

    She says women bear disproportionate responsibility for sex and what to do about pregnancy.

    Writer: Women should not be saddled with abortion responsibility. Society must prioritize caregiving.

    Polls taken since the Roe v Wade decision routinely show women in favor of abortion restrictions, and in slightly greater numbers than men. But how can this be? How can any woman want to scale back on the abortion license given them by the U.S. Supreme Court 42 years ago?

    As a one-time abortion rights supporter, I well know the temptation to see the right to abortion as a representation of women's equality. After all, bearing an unexpected child would seem to interrupt a woman's ability to design her own future according to her own goals and ambitions. More poignantly, bearing a child while in poverty or while already overwhelmed by caregiving for other children, or perhaps while experiencing health risks, reeks of an injustice known to women alone.

    Abortion would seem to provide women with a practical response to the disproportionate responsibility sexual intercourse can lay at our feet.

    But abortion, which is often the assumed solution to unexpected pregnancy in our culture, attempts to cure that sexual asymmetry: the biological fact that women get pregnant and men don't. It does this by putting the responsibility to care for — or dispense with — the life of a nascent, developing human being on women alone.

    Abortion expects nothing more of men, nothing more of medicine, and nothing more of society at large. Abortion betrays women by having us believe that we must become like men — that is, not pregnant — to achieve parity with them, professionally, socially, educationally. And if we are poor, overwhelmed or abandoned by the child's father, or if medical expenses would be too great for us or for our child, social "responsibility" requires us to rid ourselves of our own offspring.

    Today's feminists cheer us on. Is this really the equality we were looking for 42 years ago?

    I think most women want to see a culture that respects and honors women not only for the myriad talents we bring as individuals to our professions, our communities and our country. Women also want to live in a society that, at the very same time, cherishes our shared, and indeed, wondrous capacity to bear new human life. We want to be respected for the work we do as mothers.

    What about a culture where women's childbearing capacity is recognized not as an impediment to our social status and certainly not as the be-all and end-all of women's capacities as it once was, but as that which calls upon all persons in society to show a bit of gratitude? Rather than structure society around the wombless, unencumbered male, ought not society be structured around those who, in addition to being able to do all that men can do, can also bear new human life?

    Such a cultural restructuring in support of caregiving — one that pro-life feminists seek — would benefit this generation's fathers as well. Many men today would prefer to dedicate far more time and attention to their children than fathers of prior generations did, or could. Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-family policies would enable just that.

    Not all women become mothers, but those who do so depend upon a cultural esteeming of both pregnancy and motherhood for their social and professional support. When we belittle the developing child in the womb, a scientific reality that most pro-choice advocates have come to admit, we belittle and distort that child's mother. We make her out to be one with property rights over her developing unborn child (much as husbands once had property rights over their wives).

    We give her the inhumane (but for 42 years, constitutionally protected) right to decide the fate of another human being, of a vulnerable child — her child — to whom she properly owes an affirmative duty of care. We do all this rather than offering her the myriad familial and social supports she needs, whatever her situation, and cherishing her role in the miracle of human life.

    But we live in a time when to speak of that miracle or of the biological differences between the sexes seems quaint, as though we have now gotten beyond sex in the brave new world of "gender fluidity." It seems an effort to erase the notion of moms and dads --as though to do so would be a boon to progress, as though society would finally be free of those old, deterministic categories of male and female.

    But here's the rub: We can pretend sex differences do not exist, but it is women who bear the burden when we do so. Both men and women have sex but it is the woman who becomes pregnant, the woman who must either find ways to courageously and sacrificially care and nurture the developing child in her womb, or who must do the unthinkable and end her own child's life. Men can have sex and walk away, and with the right Roe gave them, they increasingly do.

    It is time to admit the truth about sexual difference — this beautiful, wondrous truth — and shape society to prioritize care for those who care for the most vulnerable. And it is time to demand more, far more, of men. (By Erika Bachiochi).

    http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/22/opinion/bachiochi-abortion-roe-v-wade/index.html

     


    votre commentaire